Jump to content

Heyward May Have Crashed the OF Market


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

And that's good for the Orioles.

If Heyward really just took an 8 year deal worth less than $185 million after being projected for $200 million plus he may have deflated an OF market with plenty of supply. That could be good for the Orioles who may look to add two of:

Span, Fowler, Jackson, Venable, Upton, and Parra.

I would be really disappointed at this point if the corner outfield was comprised of Reimold, Rickard, Hoes or Alvarez. I'm not saying those players will be cheap, but I think you could see them go for upto 10% less than where they were projected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And that's good for the Orioles.

If Heyward really just took an 8 year deal worth less than $185 million after being projected for $200 million plus he may have deflated an OF market with plenty of supply. That could be good for the Orioles who may look to add two of:

Span, Fowler, Jackson, Venable, Upton, and Parra.

I would be really disappointed at this point if the corner outfield was comprised of Reimold, Rickard, Hoes or Alvarez. I'm not saying those players will be cheap, but I think you could see them go for upto 10% less than where they were projected.

Two Opt outs 184. Eight years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else a little bummed that, at that price, the O's weren't involved? I mean who knows, he may have had no interest in the AL or Baltimore, but man I like him at 8/184 a lot more than CD at 7/150.

Not even a little. I don't think Heyward is worth anywhere close to that number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">heyward obviously went to school on ellsbury. jacoby 22M, jason 23M. statistically similar (.784 ops for JH, .768 JE)</p>— Jon Heyman (@JonHeymanCBS) <a href="

">December 11, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even a little. I don't think Heyward is worth anywhere close to that number

Is that because you just don't value defensive stats as much? If so, fair enough. But I think at 26, there's even plenty of time for him to figure things out at the plate even more, and become a significant offensive threat as well. Left handed too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else a little bummed that, at that price, the O's weren't involved? I mean who knows, he may have had no interest in the AL or Baltimore, but man I like him at 8/184 a lot more than CD at 7/150.

Nope. Not at all.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">MLB manager to Tom Verducci about Jason Heyward: "I just don't see it." <a href="https://t.co/DAxkNjntj4">https://t.co/DAxkNjntj4</a> <a href="https://t.co/38OBJX6gp4">pic.twitter.com/38OBJX6gp4</a></p>— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) <a href="

">December 11, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe title="Twitter Tweet" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" id="twitter-widget-0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="true" style="padding: 0px; border: currentColor; border-image: none; width: 100%; height: 183.26px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: static; min-width: 220px; max-width: 500px;" allowtransparency="true" data-tweet-id="675402304145764352"></iframe>

<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8" async=""></script>

If you discount the mammoth difference between a 26-year-old and a 30 or 31-year-old. Heyward could reasonably be expected to decline very little for the next 3, 4, 5 years while Ellsbury was expected to be in decline from day one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...